From the genes to the museum: the exhibition of zooarchaeological materials

From the genes to the museum: the exhibition of zooarchaeological materials

Authors

  • Bruno Moscardi Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo-UNLP. División Antropología, Laboratorio Anexo Museo de La Plata. La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Camila Oliva Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo-UNLP. La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina- Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Centro de Estudios Arqueológicos Regionales. Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/aa.v11i.7

Keywords:

Zooarchaeology, Archaeological Heritage, Museums, Buenos Aires Province

Abstract

Zooarchaeology, understood as the study of the relationships that animals have had with human populations of the past and about the multiplicity of roles they have fulfilled in human cultural systems, is a discipline that has experienced great national and international development in recent decades. The use of methods of anatomical and taxonomic quantification, and new methodologies and techniques such as isotopic and molecular analysis, has provided new perspectives for zooarchaeological research. However, we believe that the information these methodologies produce, and zooarchaeology in general, are often not adequately represented in museum institutions. These institutions mediate the link between society and its past through the construction of an institutional narrative that accompanies the archaeological collections on display. Here we research different museums of the Province of Buenos Aires and consider that the zooarchaeological record exhibition is usually subordinated to other archaeological collections (i.e. ceramics, lithic instruments), receiving a peripheral place within the institutional discourse. Therefore, we explore the diverse information that zooarchaeological samples can offer and generate proposals for their dissemination, emphasizing the importance of the protection and conservation of this heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARNDT, A.; W. VAN NEER; B. HELLE-MANS; J. ROBBEN; F. VOLCKAERT y M. WAELKENS. 2003. Roman trade relationships at Sagalassos (Turkey) elucidated by ancient DNA of fish re-mains. Journalof Archaeological Scien-ce 30:1095–105

ARNOLD, E.R.; H.J. GREENFIELD y R.A. CREASER. 2013. Archaeology. Anthro-pology. Science 5:129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-013-0121-z.

BARRIENTOS, G.; P.L. SARMIENTO y P.E. GALLIGANI. 2016. Evaluación de la diagénesis ósea mediante el uso de mi-croscopía electrónica de barrido (MEB): Aproximaciones analíticas aplicables a muestras arqueológicas. Revista Argen-tina de Antropología Biológica 18(2).

BONOMO, M.; C. SCABUZZO; G. POLITIS y A. ZUCOL. 2017. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope studies in the Paraná river delta (Argentina): An approach to prehispanic diets. Latin American Anti-quity 28:1-22

BRADLEY, D.G. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA diversity and origins of domestic lives-tock. En Archaeogenetics: DNA and the population of prehistory Europe, editado porC. Renfrew y K. Boyle, pp. 315–320. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.

BRITTON, K.; V. GRIMES; J. DAU y M.P. RICHARDS. 2009. Reconstructing fau-nal migrations using intra-tooth sam-pling and strontium and oxygen isotope analyses: A case study of modern ca-ribou (Rangifer tarandus granti). Jour-nal of Archaeological Science 36: 1163–1172.

CASTRO, A. 1983. Noticia preliminar sobre un yacimiento en la Sierra de la Venta-na, Sierras Australes de la Pcia. de Bue-nos Aires. Relaciones XV(N.S.):91-107.

CHESSON, L.A.; B.J. TIPPLE; G.N. MAC-KEY; S.A. HYNEK; D.P. FERNANDEZ y J.R. EHLERINGER. 2012. Strontium isotopes in tap water from the cotermi-nous USA. Ecosphere 3(7):67.

DELSUC F.; M. KUCH; G.C. GIBB; J. HU-GHES; P. SZPAK; J. SOUTHON; J. ENK; A.T. DUGGAN y H.N. POINAR. 2018. Resolving the phylogenetic po-sition of Darwin’s extinct ground sloth (Mylodon darwinii) using mitogenomic and nuclear exon data. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Science285:20180214.

DESVALLÉES, A. y F. MAIRESSE. 2010. Conceptos claves de museología. ICOM. International Committee for Museology (ICOFOM). https://icom.museum/es/ressource/conceptos-claves-de-museologia.

GIACCHINO, A.; J. CANALE, y Y. GURO-VICH. 2000. Guía práctica para la pre-paración de ejemplares de museo y co-lecciones de estudio: aves. Fundación Historia natural Felix de Azara, Buenos Aires.

GIFFORD-GONZALEZ, D. 2018. An Intro-duction to Zooarchaeology. Springer In-ternational Publishing AG, Switzerland.

GIOVAS, C.M. y M.J. LEFEBVRE (eds.). 2018. Zooarchaeology in Practice. Case Studies in Methodology and Interpreta-tion in Archaeofaunal Analysis. Sprin-ger International Publishing AG, Swit-zerland.

GORDÓN, F.; S.I. PEREZ; A. HAJDUK; M. LEZCANO y V. BERNAL. 2017. Dietary patterns in human populations from northwest Patagonia during Holocene: an approach using Binford’s frames of reference and Bayesian isotope mixing models. Archaeology. Anthropology. Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0459-0.

GRAYSON, D.K. 1984. Quantitative zooar-chaeology. Topics in the analysis of ar-chaeological faunas. Academic Press, New York.

KATZENBERG, A.M. 2008. Stable isotope analysis: a tool for studying past diet, demography, and life history. En Biolo-gical Anthropology of the Human Skele-ton, editado por A. M. Katzenberg y S. R. Saunders, pp. 413–60. Wiley-Liss, Hoboken.

LARSON, G.; U. ALBARELLA; K. DOBNEY; K. ROWLEY-CONWY; J. SCHIBLER y A. TRESSET. 2007. Ancient DNA, pig domestication, and the spread of the Neolithic into Europe. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciencies 104:15276–15281.

LOPONTE, D.; M. CARBONERA; M.J. CO-RRIALE y A. ACOSTA. 2016. Horti-culturists and oxygen ecozones in the tropical and subtropical forests of Sou-theast South America, Environmental Archaeology 22(3):247-267.

LOREILLE, O.; J.D. VIGNE; C. HARDY; C. CALLOU; F. TREINEN-CLAUSTRE; N. DENNEBOUY y M. MONNEROT. 1997. First distinction of sheep and goat ar-chaeological bones by the means of their fossil mtDNA. Journal of Archaeo-logical Science 24:33–7.LYMAN, R.L. 1994. Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambrid-ge.

LYMAN, R.L. 2008. Quantitative Paleozoo-logy. Cambridge University Press, Cam-bridge.LYMAN, R.L. 2018. The History of MNI in North American Zooarchaeology. EnZooarchaeology in Practice. Case Stu-dies in Methodology and Interpretation in Archaeofaunal Analysis, editado porC. M Giovas y M. J. LeFebvre, pp. 13-33. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland.

MACHUGH D. E.; G. LARSON y L. ORLAN-DO. 2017. Taming the Past: Ancient DNA and the Study of Animal Domes-tication. Annual Review of Animal Bios-ciences 5:329–51.

MATISOO-SMITH E. 2018. Ancient DNA in Zooarchaeology: New Methods, New Questions and Settling Old Debates in Pacific Commensal Studies. En Zooar-chaeology in Practice. Case Studies in Methodology and Interpretation in Ar-chaeofaunal Analysis, editado por C.M Giovas y M.J. Lefebvre, pp 209-225. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland.

MENGONI GOÑALONS, G.L. 1988. Análi-sis de materiales faunísticos de sitios arqueológicos. Xama 1:71-120.

MENGONI GOÑALONS, G.L. 1995. Impor-tancia socio-económica del guanaco en el período precolombino. En Técnicas para el manejo del guanaco, editado por S. Puig, pp. 13-25. UICN, Gland.

MENGONI GOÑALONS, G.L. 1999. Caza-dores de guanacos de la estepa patagó-nica. Sociedad Argentina de Antropolo-gía, Buenos Aires.

MENGONI GOÑALONS, G.L. 2007. Ar-chaeofaunal studies in Argentina: A historical overview. En Zooarchaeolo-gy of South America, editado por G. L. Mengoni Goñalons, pp. 1–9. British Ar-chaeological Reports International Se-ries, Oxford.

MENGONI GOÑALONS, G.L. 2010. Advan-ces in animal bone archaeology in Ar-gentina: General trends and some pros-pects for the future. En Estado Actual de la Arqueozoología Latinoamericana –Current advances for the Latin-Ame-rican archaeozoology, editado por G.L. Mengoni Goñalons, J. Arroyo-Cabrales, Ó.J. Polaco, y F.J. Aguilar, pp. 17-26. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, International Council for Archaeozoology, Universidad de Bue-nos Aires, Mexico.

MENGONI GOÑALONS, G.L. 2014 Isótopos estables en camélidos del período tardío del noroeste de Argentina (NOA): estrategias de uso y manejo de reba-ños. Revista Chilena De Antropología, 0(30). https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-1472.2014.36272.

MONISTROL, R. 2012. Museo y comuni-dad ¿Un binomio imperfecto? Anua-ri DifuCom 1, http://anuari.difucom.org/2012- 2/museo-comunidad.

MURRAY, D.; J. HAILE; J. DORTCH; N.E. WHITE; D. HAOUCHAR; M.I. BELL-GARD; R.J. ALLCOCK; G.J. PRIDEAUX y M. BUNCE. 2013. Scrapheap challen-ge: A novel bulk-bone metabarcoding method to investigate ancient DNA in faunal assemblages. Scientific Reports3:3371.

OLIVA, C. 2017. Patrimonialización de la cultura material y turismo en el sec-tor sur del Área Ecotonal Húmedo – Seca Pampeana. En Cuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamien-to Latinoamericano.Series Especiales4(3):69- 78.

OLIVA, C.; J. MOIRANO y M. SCHUTTEN-BERG. 2015. Análisis de los discursos sobre el pasado indígena en museos del Sistema Serrano de Ventania y su lla-nura adyacente, Provincia de Buenos Aires Argentina. Revista del Museo de Antropología de Entre Ríos 1(2):41-54.

OLIVA, F. y M. MORALES. 2018. Relacio-nes entre las sociedades originarias y la fauna del sur del Área Ecotonal Húmeda Seca Pampeana. El sitio Gascón 1 como expresión que trasciende la subsistencia. Revis-ta de Arqueología Histórica Argentina y Latinoamericana. Dossier “Arqueología Histórica Argentina. Situación y pers-pectivas”. 12:760-776.

OLIVA, F. y M.C. PANIZZA. 2015. Investi-gaciones Arqueológicas en el Área Eco-tonal Húmeda Seca Pampeana. EnCiencia y tecnología 2015: divulgación de la producción científica y tecnológica de la UNR, editado por C. López, pp. 1077-1083. UNR Editora, Universidad Nacio-nal de Rosario, Rosario.

OLSEN, S.J. 1971. Zooarchaeology: Animal bones in archaeology and their interpre-tation (Vol. 2). Addison-Wesley Modular Publications, Reading.

PANARELLO, H.; A. TESSONE y F. ZAN-GRANDO. 2009. Isótopos Estables en Arqueología: Principios teóricos, Aspec-tos Metodológicos y Aplicaciones en Ar-gentina. Xama 23: 115–133.

PEREZ, S.I.; M.B. POSTILLONE; D. RIN-DEL; D. GOBBO; P.N. GONZALEZ y V. BERNAL. 2016. Peopling time, spatial occupation and demography of Late Pleistocene-Holocene human popula-tion from Patagonia. Quaternary Inter-national 425: 214-223.

RECA, M.M. 2016. Antropología y Museos. Un “diálogo” contemporáneo con el patri-monio. Editorial Biblos, Buenos Aires.

REITZ, E.J. y E.S. WING. 2008. Zooar-chaeology, Cambridge manuals in ar-chaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge Univer-sity Press, Cambridge.

RENFREW, C. 2000. Archaeogenetics: Towards a population prehistory of Eu-rope. En Archaeogenetics: DNA and the population of prehistory Europe, edita-do por C. Renfrew y K. Boyle, pp. 3–11. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.

SEERSHOLM F.; T.L. COLEB; A. GREAL-YA; N.J. RAWLENCEC; K. GREIGD; M. KNAPPE; M. STATF; A.J. HANS-ENG; L.J. EASTONC; L. SHEPHERDH; A. TENNYSONH; R.P. SCOFIELDI, R. WALTERD y M. BUNCEA. 2018. Sub-sistence practices, past biodiversity, and anthropogenic impacts revealed by New Zealand-wide ancient DNA survey. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences 115(3):7771–7776.TEMPLETON, A.R. 2007. Perspective: ge-netics and recent human evolution.Evolution 61:1507–1519.

TESSONE, A. 2018. Isótopos Estables y Arqueología. Dieta y movilidad en socie-dades cazadoras-recolectoras de Pata-gonia. SEXTO SEMINARIO DE ECAMAT, Investigaciones arqueométricas en Ar-gentina. Fundamentos teórico-metodoló-gicos y casos de análisis, pp. 102–121. Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bue-nos Aires, Buenos Aires.

TESSONE, A.; A.F. ZANGRANDO; G. BA-RRIENTOS; R. GOÑI; H. PANARELLO y M. CAGNONI. 2009. Stable isotope stu-dies in the Salitroso Lake Basin (Sou-thern Patagonia, Argentina): Assessing diet of late Holocene hunter-gatherers. International Journal of Osteoarchaeolo-gy 19:297–308.

UGAN, A.; G. NEME; A. GIL; J. COLTRAIN; R. TYKOT y P. NOVELLINO. 2012. Geo-graphic variation in bone carbonate and water δ18O values in Mendoza, Argenti-na and their relationship to prehistoric economy and settlement. Journal of Ar-chaeological Science 39:2752–2763.

VAN NEER, W.; B. DE CUPERE; P. DE-GRYSE; B. FULLER; P. MUCHEZ; M. RICHARDS y M. WAELKENS. 2010. Herding practices inferred from multi-ple isotopic and heavy metal analyses of faunal remains from a classical site in Turkey. BoneCommons Item #1622.

WELLMAN, H.P.; T.C. RICK; A.T. RODRI-GUES y D.Y. YANG. 2016. Evaluating ancient whale exploitation on the Nor-thern Oregon Coast through ancient DNA and zooarchaeological analysis. The Journal of Island and Coastal Ar-chaeology 12(2):255–275.

WEST, C.F.; M. BURCHELL y C.F.T. AN-DRUS. 2018. Molluscs and Paleoenvi-ronmental Reconstruction in Island and Coastal Settings: Variability, Seasona-lity, and Sampling. En Zooarchaeology in Practice. Case Studies in Methodolo-gy and Interpretation in Archaeofaunal Analysis, editado porC. M Giovas y M. J. LeFebvre, pp. 191-208. Springer In-ternational Publishing AG, Switzerland.

WHITE, C.D.; M.E.D. POHL; H.P. SCHWARCZ y F.J. LONGSTAFFE. 2001. Isotopic evidence for Maya pat-terns of deer and dog use at Preclassic Colha. Journal of Archaeological Scien-ce, 28(1):89–107.

YACOBACCIO, H.D.; C.T. SAMEC y M.P. CATÁ. 2010. Isótopos estables y zooar-queología de camélidos en contextos pastoriles de la puna (Jujuy, Argenti-na). En Zooarqueología a principios del siglo XXI, editado por M. Gutiérrez, M. De Nigris, P.Fernández, M. Giardina, A. Gil, A. Izeta, G. Neme Y H. Yacobac-cio, pp.77-86. Ediciones Libros del Es-pinillo, Buenos Aires.

ZANGRANDO, A.F.; A. TESSONE; A. UGAN y M.A. GUTIÉRREZ. 2014. Applications of Stable Isotope Analysis in Zooar-chaeology: An Introduction. Interna-tional Journal of Osteoarchaeology24:127–133.ZEDER, M.A.; E. EMSHWILLER; B.D. SMI-TH y D.G. BRADLEY. 2006. Documen-ting domestication: The intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trends in Ge-netics 22(3): 139-155.

Published

2020-02-19

How to Cite

Moscardi, B. ., & Oliva, C. . (2020). From the genes to the museum: the exhibition of zooarchaeological materials: From the genes to the museum: the exhibition of zooarchaeological materials. Anuario De Arqueología, 11(11), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.35305/aa.v11i.7

Issue

Section

Articles